• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    nah, its a big step ahead of letting unelected billionaires control discourse, instead of an elected governing body.

    • interurbain1er
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Lemmy is still shit governance wise. It’s just a bunch of fiefdom managed by god knows who, there’s absolutely nothing democratic about it.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        no one corporation can censor it or turn it into an altright cesspool.

        every individual or company can have a federated instance if they please. lemmy is more akin to the old forums, which are a massive step forward.

        not perfect; much better.

        although i think my op was responding to another comment and i did a wrong.

        • interurbain1er
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 minutes ago

          Instances are worthless, what has value are the /c/ and absolutely nothing in the Lemmy model protects communities from the admin of the instance where it was created to go full Elon. I bet that at some point it will happen.

          Most of the time you don’t even know who is running the instance. Suffice that one of them that’s running a large enough communities needs a bit of cash and decide to sell it. Or they could be in bed/owned by any intelligence agency/corporation/political party. Who knows.

          I’ve spend a year in my lost time musing on the design of a truly decentralised model where identity, community, curation (moderation) and distribution are entirely decorrelated to address those specific issue among all the othes, including the one you mentioned. It’s complex, it’s a big task, but I don’t think it’s impossible. I’m too lazy to code it though :D