A bankruptcy judge is set to hear arguments Monday in conspiracy theorist Alex Jones ’ effort to stop the satirical news outlet The Onion from buying Infowars and turning it into a parody.

Jones alleges fraud and collusion marred the bankruptcy auction in which The Onion was named the winning bidder on Nov. 14 over a company affiliated with him.

It’s not clear how soon U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez in Houston will issue a ruling. He could allow The Onion to move forward with the sale, order a new auction or name the other bidder as the winner. At stake is whether Jones gets to stay at Infowars’ studio in Austin, Texas, under a new owner friendly to him, or whether he gets kicked out by The Onion.

  • PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Why does this shithead deserve any consideration? The American justice system is puzzling to say the least. There’s good reason people have lost faith in it.

    • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s not puzzling. Do you have money? Yes? Ok you have a different justice system.

      Oh your broke? Straight to fuckin jail.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The consideration is to ensure that assets being sold toward the monetary judgement are not sold at an arbitrarily low value. He has the right to have the assets sold at a reasonable value to fulfill the monetary judgement.

      Whether the consideration will go beyond that, is a different story. But that’s the reason the system works this way.

      If anything though, the court should be throwing the other bid out because it’s affiliated with Jones. And I think that’s what is going to happen honestly.

      • HellsBelleOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        He has the right to have the assets sold at a reasonable value to fulfill the monetary judgement.

        Not according to Legal Eagle. (thanks to justOnePersistentKbinPlease)

        The court gave the trustee wide latitude in deciding how the auction ran, what the rules were and who would be chosen to ‘win’.