(FYI - the article that the guy is replying to is misinformation. Two commenters have provided snopes links for anyone curious.)

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well, there’s nothing you can point to in what I wrote that implies anything about intent so I’d say your disagreement is pretty objectively wrong.

    • Rekorse
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you dont know what objective means.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you just say “I disagree” while having absolutely no grounds for that disagreement then you’re objectively wrong.

        • Rekorse
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I dont think you know what objective means.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think you’re asserting something with no basis again, making you objectively wrong about that too lmao.

            • Rekorse
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well as long as you are getting something out of this then thats a win in my books.