Donald Trump’s supporters thought voter fraud could determine the election outcome — until he won.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Voters’ perceptions of the economy are starting to flip along partisan lines

    I mean, no shit. People act like partisanship is arbitrary, but it isn’t. We fundamentally disagree about what economic policies, or even which economic systems are best. If you think unregulated, free-market capitalism is best, you’re going to be happiest when the free-market capitalist party is in power. If you’re a neoliberal, you’re going to be happiest when the neoliberals are in power, if you’re a social democrat, you’re going to be happiest when the social democrats are in power. If you’re a socialist, you’re going to be happiest when the socialists are in power.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They also disagree on basic reality and thinks things are good because of Trump when Trump isn’t even in power yet and things are exactly the same as yesterday. It’s not just policy preference, or even regular politics, it’s cult behavior.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        15 hours ago

        they perceive things as better because right wing propaganda pumps people full of negative emotions so they’ll vote right, and now that the election is over, they don’t need to be made to feel scared all the time

    • ApatheticCactus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Or you get even more nuanced and say unregulated free market is best only on the frontier of emerging new market sectors, and that areas we depend on should be heavily regulated, socialized, and run at cost for the public for free supported by tax dollars.

      Have different systems for different things depending on which works best for what.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Nuance is important, but it’s also difficult for laypeople. Not because they’re unintelligent, necessarily, but because they haven’t studied and trained like experts have. That’s why we have to be able to rely on experts. But, deferring to the authority of experts means giving up at least some power. I think that can work when there’s trust between the experts and the laypeople, but when trust is lost, laypeople will no longer respect the authority of experts. That’s what the experts, the “elites” have to understand: their expertise gives them authority, and with authority comes power, and, well, as uncle Ben would say, with power comes responsibility, and accountability. I don’t think the experts of today take their responsibility seriously enough, nor do I think they take proper accountability.