Former President Trump criticized the judge presiding over his 2020 election case, just days after she warned him against making any “inflammatory statements” that could intimidate witnesses or prejudice the jury pool.

In a statement posted overnight on Truth Social, Trump called U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan “highly partisan” and “very biased & unfair.”

“She obviously wants me behind bars,” he added.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Right? This whole “we can’t punish criminals because other criminals might engage in criminal behavior” attitude is mystifying to me. What ever happened with not negotiating with terrorists as a national policy?

    • Elderos@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is very odd, someone was claiming we should have let him win the other day because this would have been less dangerous. That is so fucked up. Appeasement is almost never a viable long-term solution is politics and geo-politics. The best time to deal with an abusive force is yesterday, not pulling the Band-Aid early is just making things worse. They will riots anyway, unless he turns America into autocracy, only at this point we won’t have to worry about riots.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is very odd, someone was claiming we should have let him win the other day because this would have been less dangerous.

        Anyone saying that is either a shill or a coward, and neither are people we should listen to. Our grandparents and great grandparents didn’t sacrifice everything in WWII just for us to allow fucking Nazis to waltz into power uncontested.

    • matter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The very scenario that quote came from was one of… Extensive, and disastrous, negotiation with terrorists. So, not much has changed.