Lets take a little break from politics and have us a real atheist conversation.

Personally, I’m open to the idea of the existence of supernatural phenomena, and I believe mainstream religions are actually complicated incomplete stories full of misinterpretations, misunderstandings, and half-truths.

Basically, I think that these stories are not as simple and straightforward as they seem to be to religious people. I feel like there is a lot more to them. Concluding that all these stories are just made up or came out of nowhere is kind of hard for me.

  • aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
    15·
    3 days ago

    The laws of physics, biology… blah blah blah. I really wish we’d stop arguing about the definition, because it won’t really go anywhere. You know what I mean when I say supernatural.

    • cowboydiplomat@startrek.websiteEnglish
      5·
      3 days ago

      Proofs start from axioms, which the ‘laws of nature’ as defined by you, are not. I don’t know what you mean, which is why I asked. You’re only revealing your own lack of critical thought here, this isn’t a gotcha like you think it is.

        • cowboydiplomat@startrek.websiteEnglish
          3·
          2 days ago

          No I just come from a STEM background where we have a bit of a rigorous process for concluding that something is true. You’re starting with the conclusion and saying everybody else is stupid and difficult who points out the flaws in your logic.

          • aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
            11·
            2 days ago

            I don’t know what STEM has to do with supernatural phenomena but ok. I also have a STEM background, but I haven’t mentioned it until now because it’s not relevant. I have not called anyone stupid here. The reason why I’m saying you’re being difficult, is because you are so fixated on the definition of the word supernatural, that you’re missing the whole point of this discussion. Even the mod called this out somewhere in this comment section. Most people here just want to be dictionaries, that they’re missing the deeper part of the conversation.

            • cowboydiplomat@startrek.websiteEnglish
              3·
              2 days ago

              I’m saying your initial question is problematic and a bit silly if we’re having such a hard time categorizing things between natural and supernatural. It isn’t that weird a place to start a discussion. I’m in the camp of people who thinks 1) the burden of proof is on the person making the claim, I.e. you, and 2) it’s difficult to discuss whether a thing exists if you cannot first define the thing.

              • aLaStOr_MoOdY47@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
                11·
                2 days ago

                When I say supernatural, I mean ghosts, spirits, deities, magic, aliens… etc. That kind of stuff. They all fall under the word supernatural.