• sartalon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The problem with nuclear is: business wise, it is a TOUGH sell to the public, even without the anti-nuclear lobby groups fighting with safety propaganda.

    It takes a much higher capital spend to start up nuclear than any other type of plant, so you won’t “break even” for 30 plus years, if ever.

    It doesn’t help when there are high profile sites that are being refurbished, whose costs are already phenomenaly high, and then the managing firm fucks it up (I’m looking at you Crystal River).

    It makes it high risk, financially. And it’s the public that ultimately ends up paying.

    My hope is that SMR’s become viable. They introduce a new factor though. If you get small, “cheaper” nuclear plants, then you will get more operators and you will get some that may run fast and loose. One fuck up can ruin it for everyone.

    • passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can accept the argument that it’s safe and effective but the public irrationally won’t accept it. Seems to have been a pretty good sell on the other side of the curtain though