Starlink Group 6-65 launch out of SLC-40 in Florida currently scheduled for 2024-11-30 05:00 UTC, or 2024-11-30 00:00 local time (EST). Booster 1083-6 to land on Just Read the Instructions.

Webcasts:

  • threelonmusketeersOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    As of September, SpaceX have deployed ~7,000 satellites out of a planned ~12,000 for the current constellation. They just passed 4 million subscribers in September as well.

    The number of necessary satellites is partly dictated by the number of subscribers in high density areas (max bandwidth) and partly dictated by the surface area of the Earth and the altitude of the orbit (global coverage). Since the Starlink constellation in VLEO, each satellite can service a much smaller region at any given time compared to a GEO satellite. VLEO has other advantages though, such as reduced latency and lower risk of Kessler syndrome.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Can you estimate the total co2 emissions per launch/sattelite and per user?

      How many launches does it take total?

      Why not just build some very large/tall high-power towers?

      What’s the benefit of satellite internet?

      • Robbert@mastodon.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        @masterofn001 @threelonmusketeers
        > Can you estimate the total co2 emissions per sattelite and per user?
        That needs a definition about user/time, so it is harder to do

        Per satelite is amount of sats/launches. its not perfect, but gives a reasonable answer.
        average seems to be 2Kton, 1.3Kton to 4Kton as low/high

        > How many launches does it take total? 210 till now, which i used for calculations above, how,
        to many variables i dare to give launches needed till 12k

        • Robbert@mastodon.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          @masterofn001 @threelonmusketeers
          Why not just build some very large/tall high-power towers?
          no, try doing in the middle of the ocean, and if that was cheap on land, it would already have been done, there where even subsidy to do that in most countries

          What’s the benefit of satellite internet?
          ppl where willing to pay >10X more for >10X lower data.
          Think having boats to get actual current weather information, or being to able to call for help on places where there is no connection.