[email protected] has also been blocked from lemmy.world.

edit:

Lemmy.world has released an official response.

  • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s nothing to sue? They could go after an instance owner, sure, but I’m reasonably sure that there’s still Section 230 safe harbor protections for “service providers”, which to my knowledge could easily be the owner/admin of a fediverse instance. Perhaps it’ll need to be litigated in the courts, which is unfortunate for whoever gets stuck being the trailblazer.

    • thedrizzle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Each instance owner is running these instances themselves, presumably out of the home, for free.

      They could go after an instance owner, sure, but

      There’s no “but”. They could fight a lawsuit, sure, but that’s time consuming and expensive, and why bother? The piracy isn’t coming from their instance, why should they have to fight a lawsuit for it? Piracy has its own instance, nothing has been defederated, they’re just not hosting the content on their server to save themselves the hassle down the road. I can’t imagine they’ll be the only one.

      • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but doesn’t it suck that it doesn’t matter what the law says? Do you think it’ll ever change if everyone rolls over and isolates undesirable communities (think beyond piracy to other things like adult content, or content from marginalised groups)

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They won’t really have to fight a lawsuit because it would just be thrown out if a company tried to file one.

        At worst they’d just get DMCA take down requests.

        • planish
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lawsuits don’t generally just throw themselves out. You have to pay a lawyer to show up and ask the judge to throw out the lawsuit on account of the fact that you don’t host the thing, or whatever the reason is.

          Judges don’t go out and do research; if one side’s lawyer says Whirlybird runs The Pirate Bay out of their kitchen and the other side’s lawyer isn’t there, then the court is going to proceed as though that is at least plausible.

          • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So many laws work like this too, it makes them worthless if personal wealth is required to get them enforced. If Section 230 only exists for the wealthy and corporations, the fediverse isn’t gonna get very far

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You have to pay a lawyer to show up and ask the judge to throw out the lawsuit on account of the fact that you don’t host the thing, or whatever the reason is.

            You don’t have to pay a lawyer, you can do it yourself.

            • planish
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              True. But then you have to physically show up wherever, and know how to do it right.