[email protected] has also been blocked from lemmy.world.

edit:

Lemmy.world has released an official response.

  • samus12345
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s true. The reasons given were unsatisfyingly vague.

    • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like, I think people are upset about blocking the piracy communities, sure, but I think that the real issue is that it feels like everyone is just vibing, doing their thing on their lemmy instances, then this troll comes in all fake concerned about breaking rules, gets utterly piled on naturally, only for the admins in question to come in and “side” with the “loser” in people’s eyes.

      • samus12345
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I agree with that. It’s not the blocking that’s such an issue, it’s how they came to decide to do it. Definitely wasn’t handled well. I wonder if the (even more) downtime they’ve been having recently is a result of more people being pissed about this move piling on to the DDOS attacks?

            • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mentioned earlier or elsewhere on this thread that right now, the narrative that I’m aware of is as follows:

              Lemmy.world users: just vibing, doing their thing

              Concern troll: comes in with a freshly created account to pearl-clutch about scary illegal things

              Lemmy.world users: hahaha look at this loser downvotes them to oblivion, resumes vibing

              Lemmy.world Admins: Piracy?! OMG that’s ILLEGAL, thank goodness someone pointed this out to us

              If they had an existing stance on piracy, they should have been already enforcing it. Then it wouldn’t look like they were successfully spurred into action by a bad-faith actor.

              • samus12345
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That narrative appears to be correct, although at the end I think it may have been more like “You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn’t host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy’s largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road.”

                They definitely should have been more transparent about why they chose to do it at this particular time.

                • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “You know, now that this asshole mentions it, maybe we shouldn’t host stuff from these piracy communities as Lemmy’s largest instance. That might create problems for us down the road.”

                  I’m almost certain that’s what actually went down, but I’m explicitly referring to the issue of people’s perception.