FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM to Heathcliff@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoSunday Editionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1233arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1228arrow-down1imageSunday Editionlemmy.worldFauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM to Heathcliff@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square21fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFauxPseudo @lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 month agoNo where. And then it was like a week later they told me that by posting every day I was spamming the group. That’s when I started this community.
minus-squarepimento64@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month ago@[email protected] explain yourself
minus-squareFauxPseudo @lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoHe doesn’t need to explain himself. His groups his rules. Though I definitely recommend they get a second moderator because they are way too slow to respond to things if it took months to decide my posts were spam.
minus-squarepimento64@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 month agoPeople always have a moral obligation to explain themselves when they do something boneheaded, the letter of the law is meaningless.
minus-squarelawrence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI’m open to dialogue. What would you like to know?
minus-squarepimento64@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoThe reason behind rigidly enforcing the letter of a rule with no regard for its intent and no room for contextual interpretation
minus-squarelawrence@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoWell, I don’t think I’m enforcing rules that much, but I guess it’s a matter of opinion. Maybe you are right.
minus-squareUltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 month ago @lemmy.world Well there’s your problem.
minus-squarenomous@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 month agoWow an .ml user not rambling about neoliberals or genocide, that might be a first.
minus-squareTheDorkfromYork@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoWhat is the name of the porn comic featured here?
minus-squareAtlas_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·1 month agoThey say it right in the comic - Heathcliff
minus-squareTheDorkfromYork@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoI wonder how many times someone has made this joke to me. I swear it’s a 50% chance every time I ask for a source.
minus-squareSundray@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 month ago every time I ask for a source So you can avoid it, right?
Porn? Oh no! Where?
No where. And then it was like a week later they told me that by posting every day I was spamming the group. That’s when I started this community.
@[email protected] explain yourself
He doesn’t need to explain himself. His groups his rules. Though I definitely recommend they get a second moderator because they are way too slow to respond to things if it took months to decide my posts were spam.
People always have a moral obligation to explain themselves when they do something boneheaded, the letter of the law is meaningless.
I’m open to dialogue. What would you like to know?
The reason behind rigidly enforcing the letter of a rule with no regard for its intent and no room for contextual interpretation
Well, I don’t think I’m enforcing rules that much, but I guess it’s a matter of opinion. Maybe you are right.
Well there’s your problem.
Wow an .ml user not rambling about neoliberals or genocide, that might be a first.
What is the name of the porn comic featured here?
They say it right in the comic - Heathcliff
I wonder how many times someone has made this joke to me. I swear it’s a 50% chance every time I ask for a source.
So you can avoid it, right?