• ylph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    So many Chinese character tattoos are done in the Chinese equivalent of boring Arial 10 font though, that’s part of the point. The one in the photo is at least hand written, but by someone with poor aesthetic sense, it still looks dull and ugly.

      • ylph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        There are different Chinese fonts (in print/computer context) and also different Chinese historical scripts, each with different styles of writing, and finally a very diverse variety of calligraphy styles.

        The idea of what is considered “old”, “fancy” and “fancy old” doesn’t necessarily map the same way as it does in Latin/Western writing in general, the cultural and historical sensibility and connotations are often quite different, although in most broad sense, you could find some style analogues to achieve a similar vibe, but it would be quite context dependent.

        • Mayor Poopington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Thanks for the explanation! Now I want to fuck with people by telling them they used the Chinese version of wing dings.

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Chinese characters in “arial” font would be monowidth lines, no serifs, no real pizzaz. The tattoo in the picture is how I see most Chinese character tattoos. This is still stylized a bit.

      • ylph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, but tattoos in sans serif fonts are still super common, and honestly, it makes little difference, the one in OP is still basic as fuck - call it Times New Roman instead of Arial. It reads like plain text to a Chinese reader, not some kind of calligraphy - what you call “stylized” is actually just the default original textbook stroke style of the standard script. The sans serif version with monowidth lines is actually more of a modern stylized form of that.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The one in the photo is probably still a font. How many tattoo artists would know how to write in Chinese calligraphy.

      • ylph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        To me it looks done by hand, the inconsistencies in character sizes and stroke widths wouldn’t be seen in an actual font. The 独 also looks very hand drawn, the vertical strokes on 無 as well. It’s very “textbook” calligraphy, done by someone who knows the strokes and has some practice, but dull and with no personality, and still a degree of insecurity and inconsistency in the strokes, so perhaps a late beginner to intermediate level student of calligraphy. Not necessarily by the tattoo artist either, it could have been tattooed from a template written on paper.