• Venia Silente@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, that’s, like, incredibly wasteful. 720p is fine. Where are the 540p ripcorders at?

    • RvTV95XBeo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re not going to like this, but I have been encoding my own B-tier collection in 1080p at roughly BluRay quality with HDR & Uncompressed audio. A-Tier movies stay 4K Remux, but the B-squad gets the downgrade (but I’m not willing to give up HDR / Atmos)

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, usually you don’t really notice a huge difference betwen FHD and 4K, especially with TV upscaling it anyway

      • CCMan1701A@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I love that we can reencoding the 4k HDR to 1080 while we retain the HDR color information. Looks great to me while saving a ton of space.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      I mean, if your monitor or TV is 1080p, why should you waste so much more storage to little-to-no visible improvement?