• Gloomy@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    What? You literaly poster an opinion peace. By a climate scientist, yes, but so is the response I posted.

    Plus, I quoted a study in reply to the comments about the IPCC.

    How is that climate science denial?

      • Gloomy@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        And it is science denial to have a scientific opinion that is interpreting facts differently then the consensus?

        Also, from my first source:

        “The IPCC supports the overwhelming scientific consensus about human impact on climate change, so we would expect the reports’ vocabulary to be dominated by greater certainty on the state of climate science – but this is not the case.”

        The IPCC assigns a level of certainty to climate findings using five categories of confidence and ten categories of probability. The team found the categories of intermediate certainty predominated, with those of highest certainty barely reaching 8% of the climate findings evaluated.

        “The accumulation of uncertainty across all elements of the climate-change complexity means that the IPCC tends to be conservative,” says co-author Professor Corey Bradshaw, Matthew Flinders Fellow in Global Ecology at Flinders University. “The certainty is in reality much higher than even the IPCC implies, and the threats are much worse.”