This is a genuine question.
I have a hard time with this. My righteous side wants him to face an appropriate sentence, but my pessimistic side thinks this might have set a great example for CEOs to always maintain a level of humanity or face unforseen consequences.
P.S. this topic is highly controversial and I want actual opinions so let’s be civil.
And if you’re a mod, delete this if the post is inappropriate or if it gets too heated.
Removed by mod
No it isn’t. Neither major party has used their power to fix this system. Both have had ample opportunity in the many past decades.
Due to the dominance of the FPTP system’s spoiler effect and of the two-party system, we can’t reasonably expect a mass shift to third parties. Therefore, of the two viable parties, neither will change the system. No realistic voting behavior indicates support of the broken system - if anything the lowering voter turnout is a general indication that they don’t support the system.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
cute…
Removed by mod
voting got us here ;)
Removed by mod
democrats and republicans both win election, nothing changes ;)
Removed by mod
Sure they do. Democrats go full mask off and cozy up with war criminals, going hard right instead of center right; billionaires and corporations get richer, more people feed the machine. This guy decided to be the change he wanted see. Is murder wrong? Yes. Especially when it’s millions for the sake of profit.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod