Phil@lemmy.world to General Discussion@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoLemmy growth curvemessage-squaremessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up130arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up129arrow-down1message-squareLemmy growth curvePhil@lemmy.world to General Discussion@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square37fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepleasemakesense@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoUnfortunately these are most bots, which you can see from the active user ratio
minus-squaredanc4498@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoWhat does “active” mean? Are lurkers considered active? Or do you have to vote/comment/post to be considered active?
minus-squarePhil@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoNot sure you can infer that from this chart as I believe it counts active users and contributors so lurkers won’t show up, of course will will have a lot of people checking us out. Not that bots won’t be an issue in the future they will.
Unfortunately these are most bots, which you can see from the active user ratio
What does “active” mean? Are lurkers considered active? Or do you have to vote/comment/post to be considered active?
Not sure you can infer that from this chart as I believe it counts active users and contributors so lurkers won’t show up, of course will will have a lot of people checking us out. Not that bots won’t be an issue in the future they will.