Personally I don’t really care for their games, but I know they have a lot of fans.
Is it good or bad news though? Would they consider multiplatform games, which is better and healthier? Because that ain’t happening for sure now, anymore.
As per the article Nintendo already owned 96% of the shares. Original founders had only 4% shares till March. Sometimes after that, Nintendo has acquired those 4% too.
The connection is that there’s almost no difference between 96% and 100%. When you own 96% of the company (and thus your opinion has a 96% weight), you control the company.
Personally I don’t really care for their games, but I know they have a lot of fans.
Is it good or bad news though? Would they consider multiplatform games, which is better and healthier? Because that ain’t happening for sure now, anymore.
As per the article Nintendo already owned 96% of the shares. Original founders had only 4% shares till March. Sometimes after that, Nintendo has acquired those 4% too.
Is releasing multiplats out of the question when a stakeholder has 96%? Otherwise I fail to see what the connection is to my comment
The connection is that there’s almost no difference between 96% and 100%. When you own 96% of the company (and thus your opinion has a 96% weight), you control the company.
Fair enough