Godric@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoThe questions that keep you up at nightlemmy.worldimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1523arrow-down115
arrow-up1508arrow-down1imageThe questions that keep you up at nightlemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squaresimple@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoNo way, I’d go for A. Wouldn’t want that long neck wriggling about after the cut.
minus-squaresanpedropeddlerlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·1 year agoWhy not just use two guillotines so you can do a and b. Best of both worlds.
minus-squareenkerslinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoWho the heck has the budget for 2 guillotines?? It’s clearly B. If you ever needed to put that head on a pike to send a message, you wouldn’t want to carry that big neck around.
minus-squareDenvil@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoThats a very convincing argument
minus-squaresanpedropeddlerlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIf you can afford one guillotine, you can probably afford two. If you want to send a message, double trouble head choppers will do a much better job than some pike.
No way, I’d go for A. Wouldn’t want that long neck wriggling about after the cut.
Why not just use two guillotines so you can do a and b. Best of both worlds.
Who the heck has the budget for 2 guillotines??
It’s clearly B. If you ever needed to put that head on a pike to send a message, you wouldn’t want to carry that big neck around.
Thats a very convincing argument
Exactly what I thought about
If you can afford one guillotine, you can probably afford two.
If you want to send a message, double trouble head choppers will do a much better job than some pike.