• aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    First to industrialize

    The Japanese were dumbstruck when the Dutch showed them machinery. They had been handpicking rice and painting lewd pictures of octopi up until that point.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      First to industrialize amongst their neighbors. And mechanization of rice harvesting is a very late invention.

      As is, for that matter, lewd octopus drawings, which date only to the 19th century.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        First to industrialize amongst their neighbors.

        The OP is still misleading to make his point.

        As is, for that matter, lewd octopus drawings, which date only to the 19th century.

        Most famous example from 1814 (NSFW): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dream_of_the_Fisherman's_Wife Although I bet that for a popular artist to be able to publish this openly, it probably means it was already floating in the culture before. The article mentions earlier netsuke, but without dates and the sources are books.

              • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                About the “first to industrialize”, it didn’t make sense unless you add “among its neighbors”, because Western countries industrialized before and brought a lot of technology to Japan, especially modern guns and much more after the Meiji restoration from 1868 and the reopening of Japan after 2.5 centuries of isolation under the Edo period.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            I guess it’s just a mean way to say soften to adapt to local taste. It may also be to appeal to racist people who don’t believe cultural mixing is positive. It’s about Japanese curry. Japan appropriated a lot of other foods, for example breads from Europe and did their own versions, it’s rather fun. Their word for bread is “pan” パン, it comes directly from Portuguese (also same in Spanish).

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      They were so late to industrialize that they were using mules/donkeys to taxi new zero planes from the factory to the runway during WW2.

    • Atlusb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Well it is good stuff. Best currys outside their country of orgin are being cooked here.

  • fartsparkles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    Fried fish was introduced to England by the resident Jewish population in London, along with fried chips. They had migrated to England from the Netherlands, and Portugal/Spain before that.

      • fartsparkles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 days ago

        I wasn’t saying it was wrong, just sharing some fun history facts…

    • jaycifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Oh, I just read a book called 1632 that touched on this. If I recall the term for them was Sephardic Jews, and due to prejudice large portions of them moved around until settling in England because the monarchy at the time promised protection. They still weren’t allowed real positions of power, but did fill many roles as financial advisers.

      Of course the book was published 25 years ago, so some of that information may be outdated.

      • fartsparkles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Oooo I’ll have to put that on my list! Thanks for sharing.

        • jaycifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Eric Flint wrote it. I don’t think I made it clear, but know that it’s a piece of fiction where a coal mining town from Virginia gets sent back in time to 1632 German Thuringia and brings American values to the Thirty Years War. It was written by a historian though, so the setting around the story is as accurate as it could be. A lot of the book has aged not so great in terms of what was progressive for the 90’s when it was written, but the premise is out there enough to make up for it, and I really enjoyed how the history is portrayed.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Historically yes, but in the 19th and early 20th century, Japan expanded significantly, while China shrunk. China was still bigger, but Japan had ‘gained’ more imperial territory, if that makes sense.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 days ago

        So I guess this would this also take into account a difference between an “Empire” and a “kingdom” or other proto-nation-state-ish polity.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        What would make more sense is if the OP situated it in recent history in some way, it would have made his post more clever.