• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    As a result, some consumers resorted to purchasing TPM modules for their existing hardware, while others turned to customized Windows 11 ISOs that bypassed the TPM requirement entirely.

    Who is doing this?!? If you are a business user, your company should pay for a new PC. If you are a gamer, you have a year to upgrade your MB. Everyone else has a year to figure out if Linux is right for them. At this point, Linux can perfectly cover most non-business users or those who are not multiplayer online gamers.

    • vulgarcynic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The amount of corporate environments running old builds, 3+ patches behind or pro/home versions would shock anybody with an inkling of security awareness.

      If you’re going to run Windows as a business and especially if you’re going to rely on Defender, you gotta be on top of shit. Most are woefully far outside of that

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I play tons of games on Linux. I was mainly referring to AAA online multiplayer games with anti-cheat like COD, Valorant, Apex Legends, etc.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I got the notice to update to 11 a long time ago, then months later a notice my work laptop did not comply with requirements of TPM, but CPU OK.

      For my HP workstation it had TPM 1.x and there was a firmware update that brought chip up to TPM 2.0. After I did that the W11 then said CPU doesn’t pass.

      Then recently CPU is fine. LOL

      They don’t even know what they want.

      For home stuff everything is moved to Linux.