GiddyGap@lemm.ee to News@lemmy.world · 14 hours agoA simple device could help curb accidental gun deaths, but most firearms don’t have itwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down18
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-linkA simple device could help curb accidental gun deaths, but most firearms don’t have itwww.nbcnews.comGiddyGap@lemm.ee to News@lemmy.world · 14 hours agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squareGiddyGap@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·9 hours agoIt seems Trump has no problem advocating for undoing the 14th Amendment to ban birthright citizenship. If he does that, I see no problem undoing the 2nd Amendment.
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoYeah, no amendment can be undone in the current climate. Doing it requires a 290 votes in the House, a body that last needed 15 tries to get a 218 vote simple majority to decide who their own leader will be. Then you need a 67 vote majority in the Senate, a body that’s blocked from doing anything by a 60 vote majority to break a filibuster. If by some miracle, both of those things happen, then the change needs to be ratified by 38 states. In the last election, Trump won 31 states, so he’d need 7 Harris states to back him on repealing an amendment. Aint happening.
It seems Trump has no problem advocating for undoing the 14th Amendment to ban birthright citizenship. If he does that, I see no problem undoing the 2nd Amendment.
Yeah, no amendment can be undone in the current climate.
Doing it requires a 290 votes in the House, a body that last needed 15 tries to get a 218 vote simple majority to decide who their own leader will be.
Then you need a 67 vote majority in the Senate, a body that’s blocked from doing anything by a 60 vote majority to break a filibuster.
If by some miracle, both of those things happen, then the change needs to be ratified by 38 states.
In the last election, Trump won 31 states, so he’d need 7 Harris states to back him on repealing an amendment. Aint happening.