• hubobes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Because it made us wealthy? And because Switzerland has strong social security and failing in that free market is unpleasent but you will not go bankrupt or become homless.

      That is ignoring the environmental destruction and what it does to other countries but for us the free market together with social policies worked wonders and people are keen to keep that alive.

      • thisfro@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        but you will not go bankrupt or become homless.

        Are you sure about that?

        • hubobes
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yes quite sure, if you are homeless you are so by choice. The government will provide for you, not unconditionally (you are required to look for a job or reeducate) but they will.

          • thisfro@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            What if you can’t work? It was more of a rethorical question, as I know from personal experience, you can be very close to homelessness very quick. The different agencies will tell you that another is resposible and you get nothing for a very long time.

            Yes it is a lot better rhan in the US and other places, but homeless people being homeless by choice is just not true and frankly a disgusting claim.

            • hubobes
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Can you prove this is a systematic issue? I know various people who lost their job or had to claim IV and not one of these was at risk of loosing the roof over their head.

              • thisfro@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I don’t have to prove anything, as an indovidual case invalidates your claim.

                • hubobes
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  No an individual case might be a mistake. You would have to proof a systematic behaviour of our government to prove that it does not usually work fine.