• Volkditty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 days ago

    I started reading Stoicism as an angry discontented man in my mid-20s. At the time it was very helpful and I still appreciate some of the philosophy but I stopped calling myself a Stoic when I saw how some online communities used it as a gateway to right-wing ideology.

    One of the central tenets of Stoicism is that the only thing you can control is your own thoughts and actions. It’s very easy to twist that into “the only thing that matters is your own thoughts and actions and no one can ever tell you you’re wrong.”

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      Also, it easily morphs into the proposition that attempting to fight injustice or make the world a better place beyond improving one’s own lot (and ability to tune out annoyances beyond one’s control) is a fool’s errand, and can be a call to renounce responsibilities and retreat into an internal exile. Which is a useful ideology for the unfree, but antithetical to the propositions of democratic society.

      • V0ldek@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Step one is understanding you only control your own thoughts and actions. Step two is learning how to control your anger and use it as fuel for deliberate actions.

        Honestly, I think Luigi here just followed this wisdom. Recognised that he was rightfully angry at the system and directed that anger at someone responsible. You only control your actions, and your action can be to shoot a motherfucker on the street ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        I’m not condoning or saying it’s morally acceptable, but I don’t think it’s philosophically incoherent.