The Constitution just says you need a postal service, it doesn’t say it needs to be government run. They can easily make an argument like that. The postmaster general would just be handing out contracts instead of running it.
I don’t see this Supreme Court pushing back too hard on any interruption similar to this.
The Constitution just says you need a postal service, it doesn’t say it needs to be government run. They can easily make an argument like that. The postmaster general would just be handing out contracts instead of running it.
I don’t see this Supreme Court pushing back too hard on any interruption similar to this.