• Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Snowden, and Greenwald by extension, are perfect examples of how being right about one thing doesn’t make someone right about everything. I also have serious problems with how Snowden chose to whistleblow, though the actual whistleblowing was necessary.

      • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Definitely made a deal with the devil. I can’t say I wouldn’t do the same in his shoes though, and I’m as anti-Russia as they come.

        • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          There were a lot of options for non-extradition before Russia. Even the route he took when he fled doesn’t make a ton of sense unless he’s selling the information to America’s security competitors. My guess is he genuinely believed in leaking the information and he got paid to do it by one or more foreign countries.

          • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Well the US made a sovereign country president plane land with a threat they will shoot it down then grabbed out the president of a sovereign country from his plane and searched the plane for Snowden. There are probably 3 countries in the world the US wouldn’t do this to: China, Russia and Israel. So no, Snowden didn’t have much choice.