• fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s not really how jury’s work though.

    You’re not there to dispense justice. You’re there to decide whether the defendant is guilty of the charges against him.

    Someone will be along in a moment to tell us all about Jury Nullification, a refusal to find the defendant guilty on the grounds that it would be unjust, despite the defendant’s obvious guilt.

    This pretty much reduces the court process to a popularity contest - how does the jury “feel” about the defendant, what are the “vibes” of the circumstances before them.

    Jurors determine guilt, and judges determine punishments. The separation of these concerns is the best way we have found to mitigate corruption since the advent of written laws. The outcome of a specific case may be unjust, but the system produces the fewest unjust outcomes.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      Maybe they should fix the justice system if they want juries to actually act like they’re intended to.

      But they won’t, billionaires, CEOs, business execs, and other parasites will continue to do what they like and harm who they like with a slap on the wrist at most.