m_f@midwest.socialM to Fun Loops ▶️@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 day ago[R] Stupidest ways people have solved coding interviewsloops.videoexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down15
arrow-up172arrow-down1external-link[R] Stupidest ways people have solved coding interviewsloops.videom_f@midwest.socialM to Fun Loops ▶️@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareScreamingFirehawk@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 day agoIt doesn’t, the array is still in the same order it started in, it’s members are just printed to the console in numerical order. It just prints the number 1 after 1 ms, 2 after 2 ms, 3 after 3 ms etc.
minus-squareRandelung@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·22 hours agoInstead of print you could add them to a second array, though. Even clear the original first for “in place” sorting; never mind the memory allocation for the lambdas.
Why does the sort one work? 🤨
It doesn’t, the array is still in the same order it started in, it’s members are just printed to the console in numerical order.
It just prints the number 1 after 1 ms, 2 after 2 ms, 3 after 3 ms etc.
Instead of print you could add them to a second array, though. Even clear the original first for “in place” sorting; never mind the memory allocation for the lambdas.