• conciselyverbose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Qualcomm bought nuvia, which had a broad license to use ARM’s IP. They used said IP to make chips.

    ARM claims that the change in ownership somehow invalidates the license and they were required to renegotiate new terms.

    They couldn’t convince a jury because that doesn’t make sense without very specific terms explicitly detailing exactly what conditions nullify their license agreement.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      I don’t know why a blanket, terms not transferable upon sale, wouldn’t have covered it, but either that is too broad or didn’t exist in the original Nuvia contract.

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        Companies get acquired all the time. Losing licenses is not the norm.

        • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          28 minutes ago

          I agree but that doesn’t really have anything to do with what’s in the Nuvia contract. I assume you mean it wouldn’t be the norm to have not transferrable in there.

          • conciselyverbose
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 minutes ago

            Yeah, the terms would probably be legal, but they’d be so prohibitive that most companies wouldn’t sign them. Having to get a new license to key technology negotiated when you want to sell is a huge handicap.