• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Which would in turn require revenue for hosting and development. Meaning either ads, or monthly payments.

    I’d rather not pay you for a service which shouldn’t need to exist. And it could be done away with by requiring an easy “cancel subscription” button which requires no hoops to go through.

    • explodicle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You’re already paying for automated payment infrastructure; it’s just included in the price of subscription products.

      The cancel subscription requirement is also very reasonable IMHO. But that makes it difficult for average users to see how many subscriptions they’ve got active; who’s currently authorized to withdraw money from their account. The default remains keeping the subscription active.