• peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Correct. And I strongly suspect they are wildly pumping out news about him to narrow the juror pool to people who do live under rocks.

    The other option is that jurors lie about their bias, which opens them up for legal consequences.

    His defense, in any case, has a very difficult task - they need to be able to somehow communicate him being innocent against stacked charges OR paint him light that the rest of us see that leans them towards Jury Nullification.

    My hope is that potential jurors hide their bias, which isn’t easy, but gives him the best chance.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      The other option is that jurors lie about their bias, which opens them up for legal consequences.

      That’s almost impossible to prove, and almost never prosecuted.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        There are plenty of nevers and almost nevers with this case already, so it’s not unreasonable to worry that there might be more.

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’re trying to use fear to spin a story against this guy. They’re going to use fear when telling them about lying under oath.

        They’re going to use fear the whole way, it’s their only weapon.

        It’s why they are so afraid. A lot of us see through it, and see their real fear.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      If they can find an “unbiased” jury, then the defense does indeed have a difficult challenge ahead. Even if the prosecution fails with their terrorism charge, they can fall back on murder 2, which is much harder to defend against.