HRC Article:

WASHINGTON — Last night, President Biden signed the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law, which includes a provision inserted by Speaker Mike Johnson blocking healthcare for the transgender children of military servicemembers. This provision, the first anti-LGBTQ+ federal law enacted since the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, will rip medically necessary care from the transgender children of thousands of military families – families who make incredible sacrifices in defense of the country each and every day. The last anti-LGBTQ+ federal law that explicitly targeted military servicemembers was Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which went into effect in 1994.

Biden’s press release:

No service member should have to decide between their family’s health care access and their call to serve our Nation.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    we should swap the pardon power for line item veto

    Yeah. Would be neat watching Democrats make excuses for why only Republicans could use it.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      You know, I get that there are problems with the Democrats, I really do. But when a Republican alters a bill to include a massively shitty clause, and the president signs it in place because the alternative is likely people not getting paid, and someone suggests a fix to this shitty behavior in a broken system, you always lean into the response of, “Yep, too bad the Democrats don’t want to do shitty stuff, too.” While consistently ignoring all the rest of it.

      It makes me think you might not be discussing this in good faith.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        But when a Republican alters a bill to include a massively shitty clause, and the president signs it in place because the alternative is likely people not getting paid

        Where do you draw the line?

        If a Republican alters a bill to include “outlaw miscegenation among military servicemembers” and the president signs it because the alternative is likely people not getting paid, are you okay with that?

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          “outlaw miscegenation among military servicemembers”

          You sir have sent me to a dictionary. You are hereby awarded one pat to be applied to the back

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            miscegenation

            yeah, up to now I had forgotten that trump has a history of hating black people in particular. I imagine that will errupt pretty soon in some way or another.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nope, but if he hadn’t signed it the headline would have been “Biden Canceled Christmas for America’s Troops”, which is a large part of the reason the Republicans did this, and the same people who are complaining about him signing would be complaining about him not signing.

          And honestly, I think this will be forgotten pretty quickly when Trump and the Republicans start rolling out all kinds of regressive laws, some of which I’m sure will supercede this. And some people here will blame the Democrats for not having run a compelling enough campaign, since personal survival isn’t compelling enough for some people.

          • Ledivin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            I’m glad the president that already lost the election cares more about headlines than his constituents rights.

            • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              Three things. You’re surprised the party member is concerned about the optics for headlines affecting his party in a thread entirely about people complaining about the party because of his actions? And what do you think the outcome would be if he hadn’t signed it, when the other party has already repeatedly demonstrated that they’re happy to watch the whole thing burn for headlines? All while happily ignoring my last paragraph where I quite clearly state that I think this little rider will be shortly superceded by other, more expansive laws the Republicans have stated they will do in Project 2025 and Agenda 47 (or whatever Trump decided to call his version of Project 2025).

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Oh no, not a bad headline! Think of what that would do to Biden’s reelection chances! 🙄

            Do not obey in advance. Democrats, by giving ground here, are laying the groundwork for much worse things that Republicans are going to be able to do in the future. I’m trans and I’m pretty sure I’m going to fucking die, because Democrats would rather sacrifice me to avoid bad headlines.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Ah, the commenter who was dedicated to the loss of the Dems at all costs is now giving advice to the Democratic Party, how wonderful. And blaming the GOP administration that may very well kill her and countless other oppressed demographics, myself included, she helped usher in on the Dems too, how predictable.

              By a con­tin­u­ous shift­ing of rhetor­i­cal focus, the Democratic Party is at the same time too strong and too weak, right?

              • kreskin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                14 hours ago

                I dunno about weak/strong, but disappointing, lazy, unprincipled, corrupt and feckless? yes.

              • cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                23 hours ago

                The democratic party is a bourgeoisie party that serves the interests of the ruling class, just like the Republicans. It is irrelevant what you say or do, the outcome of elections is determined by the bourgeoisie of the United States. Democrats have made numerous promises to protect trans people and yet, 121 democrats voted for this bill.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  The democratic party is a bourgeoisie party that serves the interests of the ruling class, just like the Republicans. It is irrelevant what you say or do, the outcome of elections is determined by the bourgeoisie of the United States.

                  Imagine being this desperate to absolve the electorate for voting in fascism.

                  Democrats have made numerous promises to protect trans people and yet, 121 democrats voted for this bill.

                  I’m sorry that you have no understanding of how legislature and politics actually function.

                  • cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    21 hours ago

                    Imagine being this desperate to absolve the electorate for voting in fascism.

                    1. The turnout of this election was 63.9%, meaning around 88084000 people did not vote for either of the two candidates. That is more votes than for Trump or Harris, making “No One” the real winner of the popular vote. The USA bourgeoisie liberal democratic political system cannot garner large support of the population to “legitimize” it through the process of election.

                    2. Republican, AND all voters voters consistently ranked the economy as the number one issue to them this election. Voters flock to Trump due to his perceived opposition to the ruling class of the United States, and the injury to their economic conditions under Biden, mainly through inflation. Fascism coats itself in populist rhetoric to the confused but class conscious, proletariat.

                    https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/09/09/issues-and-the-2024-election/

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election

                    I’m sorry that you have no understanding of how legislature and politics actually function.

                    Democrats control the Senate, and The Presidency. The house has one of the most razor thin majorities in US history. There is simply no world where this bill passed if the Democrats didn’t support it.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Ah, the commenter who was dedicated to the loss of the Dems at all costs

                You spent the past year saying that about anyone who was in the least upset about genocide.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  It’s funny, considering that I’m incredibly anti-Israel, I just thought that enabling multiple genocides, like you and your ilk so tirelessly worked for, was not actually a solution to Palestinian genocide. Ridiculous, I know! Surely the genocide of American minorities and of Ukrainians will bring peace to Palestine!

                  Or have you already moved on to the next talking point as so many of your compatriots have done, of “Well yes, American genocide doesn’t help, but it’s only fair if Palestine is genocided that American minorities are genocided too!”

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    It’s funny, considering that I’m incredibly anti-Israel, I just thought that enabling multiple genocides, like you and your ilk so tirelessly worked for,

                    Criticism of those who supply weapons for genocide is not support for genocide. Criticism of those who throw trans people under the bus is also not support for genocide.

                    Spending a year shouting abuse at anyone who dares to say that Democrats should not be supporting genocide? That shit right there is support for genocide.

                    Surely the genocide of American minorities and of Ukrainians will bring peace to Palestine!

                    We had an election. You can no longer pretend that “We’re second worst” is the issue you and the rest of the pro-genocide wing of the second shittiest party spent a year pretending it was. We tried to warn you, and you interpreted being able to see the writing on the wall as trump support from russians.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Democrats chose who they wanted to be shitty to.

        This is going to be Democrats’ last word about trans people for a long time.