I find the AI Art debate very interesting. Should it be praised as art? Is it a cheap ripoff that cheapens the “real deal”?
I don’t know. All I know is I’ve seen AI art so beautiful and unique that I can’t bring myself to condemn it. I like what I’m seeing. I still respect the commitment to “real” art. I like both. Is it wrong to like both?
No.
Art is subjective.
I’m just saying I’ve seen AI art I’ve personally considered beautiful and I don’t really care too much how it came into existence, just that it exists.
You have seen beautiful AI art yet refuse to share it. You sound like the tech-bros who generate magical applications with ChatGPT but refuse to show the source code. Same bullshit.
Do you think I care enough about you to have saved up the links to beautiful AI art knowing that someday an annoying internet troll would require that I show them the links to prove to them that beautiful AI art exists?
Are you high? Or were you just born this way?
Like, what kind of asshole responds to a post saying “I’ve seen beautiful AI art” by stating the poster MUST show them the art or their point it moot? Honestly, fuck off trollface. The point of the post is not to show you the art. It’s to discuss whether people think its existence is justified based on how it’s created.
Are you seriously too stupid to get that?
You pretend that something exists. I ask for proof. No proof. How is that trolling?