silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · edit-26 days agoBiden Expected to Permanently Ban Oil Drilling in Some Federal Waterswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1189arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1186arrow-down1external-linkBiden Expected to Permanently Ban Oil Drilling in Some Federal Waterswww.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · edit-26 days agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaresilence7@slrpnk.netOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·6 days agoIt’s not that simple; it will require either courts to invalidate part of a law, or congress to change the law
minus-squareJeeBaiChow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 days agoYeah, except that thanks to the sitouts he now has both.
minus-squaretheonlytruescotsmanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-26 days agoOr the companies to do it anyway, and the president gives police protection to prevent any court officers from enacting any judgement against the company.
minus-squareramble81@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 days agoCheck out my comment here It’s entirely possible that’s exactly what will happen.
It’s not that simple; it will require either courts to invalidate part of a law, or congress to change the law
Yeah, except that thanks to the sitouts he now has both.
Or the companies to do it anyway, and the president gives police protection to prevent any court officers from enacting any judgement against the company.
Check out my comment here
It’s entirely possible that’s exactly what will happen.