• TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I dunno. Because when creators are pushing those affiliate links, they’re offering discounts. That’s why their users go there. And if honey was giving them a bigger discount, I’m sure that’s not illegal. But if it was just poaching the 10% 94 whatever the creator was already offering, giving them still 10%, but taking that “last click” because it checked?

    Who knows, the company is bigger and has PayPal at its back. So might makes right in US law. I’m sure that will be the outcome. But I’ve been surprised before.

    • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Affiliate links generally have nothing to do with discounts. Coupon codes do, and custom shop urls also often do, but I don’t think those were poached by honey, as they require manual input. Many creators just have affiliate links from amazon (for example) where they just list tools/stuff they used in their videos under the description and you can buy stuff at no extra cost and support the creator. You can also buy the same stuff for the same price by just going to Amazon, and the creator gets nothing. E.g. LTT could have a pc build video and list all the parts on newegg with their affiliate links, they don’t need any special partnership for the video, just to be part of neweggs affiliate program. This is hugely important for smaller content creators that don’t have the pull to get partnerships.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        Plenty of creators I watch have links instead of coupon codes. So it’s not just broadly one way