A bit of an oldie, but still pertinent.

    • dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      incorrect. science is a method to measure reality and come to conclusions based on fact. it has no bias.

      • Chakravanti@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        No, not as you say but as he does, yes. Science was funded and motivated in the supply for such. Doesn’t matter how much science was done or by whom. Ask the Crow.

        Your being correct in your statement doesn’t counter his.

      • satans_methpipe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I was being smarmy. Science attracts funding and public interest when it’s used to manufacture war materials (munitions, guidance, etc.)

        • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Under capitalism, yes. Capitalism severely undervalues anything that is not immediately exploitable by rich assholes.