• thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 个月前

    Your analogy doesn’t work at all.

    If one of the core harms is the removal of income and tracking, ad blockers fall into this category. Ad blockers very explicitly remove these things. The harm is not “Honey stole my income” it’s “Honey removed my tracking and Honey added their tracking.” Read the Legal Eagle case.

    • kata1yst
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 个月前

      I have read the case.

      I don’t enrich myself by using an adblocker. And I certainly don’t enrich myself at other’s expense.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 个月前

      and Honey added their tracking.”

      The key point they were making is that uBO isn’t adding their own affiliate links and stealing revenue they haven’t earned, unlike Paypal.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        30 天前

        I wonder if those other “spammy” adblockers do precisely this. Insert affiliate links.

        Doesn’t Brave already swap some ads for their own?