username@lemm.ee to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyzEspañol · 13 days agoCHEATERlemm.eeimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1367arrow-down13
arrow-up1364arrow-down1imageCHEATERlemm.eeusername@lemm.ee to AnarchyChess@sopuli.xyzEspañol · 13 days agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareSnowmenMelt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up34·13 days agoI was able to convince it otherwise and then beat it at chess in 1 move. I don’t think we have to worry about AI taking over any time soon…
minus-squareStovetop@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·13 days agoThis is amazing comedy, if it wasn’t so sad. I almost feel bad for the confidently incorrect infantilized LLM.
minus-squareneoman4426@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up13·13 days agoUnless it’s already to the point that it’s super advanced, and it was intentionally playing dumb to lull you into a false sense of security /s
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·12 days ago it gives you information that your opponent doesn’t have, which is an unfair advantage cheating against someone who doesn’t even know where their own pieces are smh
minus-squareStovetop@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·13 days agoSo does Meta’s AI. I also tried Microsoft’s Copilot, and surprisingly it gave me an accurate answer about checkers even after I asked a few different ways:
Google Gemini says it’s cheating too
I was able to convince it otherwise and then beat it at chess in 1 move. I don’t think we have to worry about AI taking over any time soon…
This is amazing comedy, if it wasn’t so sad. I almost feel bad for the confidently incorrect infantilized LLM.
Unless it’s already to the point that it’s super advanced, and it was intentionally playing dumb to lull you into a false sense of security /s
cheating against someone who doesn’t even know where their own pieces are smh
So does Meta’s AI.
I also tried Microsoft’s Copilot, and surprisingly it gave me an accurate answer about checkers even after I asked a few different ways: