• Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    14 days ago

    People are talking about a double standard, but if I’m honest, I don’t really think it is. There’s a real double standard especially with respect to women’s upper bodies, and that bit tacked onto the end about a man from the Gold Coast is absolutely beyond the pale. But if there’s a rule against nudity, presumably there has to be a line somewhere where technically someone might be wearing clothes, but it’s not realistically enough to count?

    Personally, I’d be fine with just allowing nudity and normalising it…at least at pools. That would take away all its power. But so long as we don’t live in that world, it seems reasonable to say that clothing so skinny it gets hidden by the bum cheeks is not within acceptable limits.

    There seem to be some people trying to turn this into a US-style argument about women’s clothing in offices or at schools. But there’s a big difference between a bit of leg above the knee, or exposed shoulders, and the bum crack, I feel. It’s equally inappropriate (or appropriate) for men and for women.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    they allow speedos (us slang for man’s bikini bottom / banana hammock)? then anything should be available for women.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      speedos (us slang for man’s bikini bottom

      Both of those are allowed, what’s not allowed is gstrings which is for both of the genders

      “Thongs and G-string swimwear is not acceptable for males or females when visiting our leisure centres."

    • m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      It sounds like they allow (and prohibit) Speedos and women’s bikini bottoms of similar cuts, ie, briefs but not thongs.

      The rule states “males and females”.

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Even if it didn’t start as a thong, if the material is worn or your doing breast stroke/frog kick, its gonna end up that way.

      If you can see someone’s butthole in the pool, you are way too close. Just be thankful that its a clean butthole :D

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    It all changes over time. What was considered revealing in the 1900s is regarded as ridiculous.

    And fashions in swimwear change. High cut, low cut, cover this a bit more, show a bit more of that…

    You know how to fix it? Just stop being a perve. Nobody is forcing you to look at anything.

  • befed@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Last time I went to the pool with the family, my sister was wearing one of those g-string style bottoms. I fully support this ban.

  • Makhno@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    No one wants to see your asshole at the pool. If that’s too much for you to handle just stay home

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    I predict that the moment men start showing up wearing thongs, nobody will have a problem with this rule.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      i think the opposite, if men start showing up in mankini’s with a ball or dick popping out every now and then will result in the quickest ban in history

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          a once off promotional event which was done expressly for absurdity sake vs thousands of men genuinely wearing it as a swimsuit every week I think would get a different reaction

          if your reaction to tony abbott was bad i don’t even want to think what the reaction would be like if women went down to the beach and saw hundreds of men in mankinis

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Nobody wants to see your chocolate starfish trying to hide behind some butt floss. So I’m going to go with “no”.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I mean I saw wayy more than I ever wanted to of tony abbott but that passed without fucking comment

      • ikt@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        but that passed without fucking comment

        you gotta be kidding me?

        you say it like nobody cared about tony abbott when it was the opposite, it was a huge raygun style meme at the time, it was an australia wide ‘please don’t’ and lasted for years and as you have kindly pointed out, still being brought up to this day

        https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/budgie-smuggler-abbott-unaustralian-of-year/rdeerx6kc

        https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/tony-abbott-declares-campaign-a-budgie-smuggler-free-zone-20130811-2rpsp.html

        oMG DouBLe StAnDarDs

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Yeah he got sporked - but was anyone bringing in bylaws to prevent men wearing them?

          oMg pOlItIcIaN FuNnY SaMe aS OuTrIgHt bAn!

          • ikt@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            Yeah he got sporked

            you say that like if 20 million people body shamed julia gillard it wouldn’t be the guardians top story of the year, biggest outrage and constantly reinforced under every article about sexism and double standards since then

            was anyone bringing in bylaws to prevent men wearing them?

            I duno, was there any demand for one? Is a shirtless guy wearing underwear equivalent to young girls running around near nude?

            I duno why i’m even here, i never even go on the beach

            edit: it looks like they are both banned anyway

            “Thongs and G-string swimwear is not acceptable for males or females when visiting our leisure centres."

            Australia had a long history of policing women’s bodies

            Blue Mountains Leisure Centres is saying that men can’t wear them either?? How did this go from men and women can’t wear this to just women are impacted?

    • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      From the sounds of it, typical bikini briefs are allowed, only g-strings are not. Of the styles shown in this image from Wikipedia, only the one labelled “thong” would be banned, I think. Men’s speedos are usually most similar to the one labelled “bikini”.