TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 14 hours agoHow does Netflix have such poor OPSEC?lemm.eeimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1243arrow-down16
arrow-up1237arrow-down1imageHow does Netflix have such poor OPSEC?lemm.eeTheImpressiveX@lemm.ee to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·14 hours agoIt’s surprising it doesn’t happen more often. They send out review copies to “journalists” months in advance, all it takes is one of them to have poor opsec.
minus-squareBobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachtslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·10 hours agoI’m guessing the copies they send to “journalists” have some sort of individualized watermark. Of course that would only fight leakers, not the “journalists” getting hacked
minus-squarewise_pancake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 hours agoThere are two in the top corners at least
minus-squarewhyNotSquirrellinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down1·14 hours agofor this kind of release but bigger blockbuster I guess critics are invited to see it in private
It’s surprising it doesn’t happen more often.
They send out review copies to “journalists” months in advance, all it takes is one of them to have poor opsec.
I’m guessing the copies they send to “journalists” have some sort of individualized watermark. Of course that would only fight leakers, not the “journalists” getting hacked
There are two in the top corners at least
for this kind of release but bigger blockbuster I guess critics are invited to see it in private