• UNY0N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Ouchie. OK, I get all that, not gonna argue.

    But I’m in a completely different position as a hobbyist, I have completely different criteria.

    Thanks for sharing!

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Some of this I think still goes for hobbyists if they plan to buy the printer as a kit. The first (of like, eight) Prusas I built I had a hell of a time assembling the extruder mech because it’s not designed to be easy or sane to assemble, I still pinched wires, not bad enough to break anything but still. And I had built several 3D printers and a couple laser engravers prior to this.

      And that PINDA probe mount is still hilariously delicate.

      As a hobbyist machine that will spend most of its time powered off, they’re fine. For their gantry mechanism and the 8-bit control board, they’re surprisingly high quality if slightly slow printers.

      Oh there’s another thing: The Prusa community is in the bad habit of sharing G-Code rather than STLs, because everyone everywhere has the same printer, right?

      My personal printer is still my first manually leveled Folger 2020 i3 with some customization of mine, and I don’t need another.