• burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The possible Utah spaceport is news to me. I don’t get that at all. Who would use it? Virgin Galactic, Blue Origin (New Shepard), and Stratolaunch all don’t need it for any suborbital missions. Maybe they could stick it out in the desert and get SpinLaunch?

    • threelonmusketeersOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s especially weird given that Utah is a landlocked state. Any orbital launches would need to fly over another state. Could they even get approval for that?

      • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        SpaceX had talked about trying to get eastward launches out of Vandenberg. And Utah has a whole lot of nothing. So, maybe?

  • Ghyste
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Blue Origin nailed ⅔ of their New Glenn debut: ascent and staging, and orbit insertion. We still don’t know what happened to the first stage during reentry.

    Not bashing them at all, for the record. The headline is just very tilted to BO.

    • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Right, especially when SpaceX caught another booster and was testing a new ship variant that still started up normally. And Blue’s ambitious launch ramp up requires booster reuse.

      People really want a SpaceX competitor and are pretending it’s here. Meanwhile, 8 Falcons have launched this year (a 9th is scheduled for today), including 4 customer launches.