Italy’s ‘Piracy Shield’, despite blocking thousands of illegal streaming sites, has failed boost viewership for legal services like DAZN.

    • Lemmchen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Who would have thought people aren’t paying for stuff that’s not worth paying for?

  • albert180@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    But now they have a nice censor infrastructure in Place. Luckily they don’t have some right-wing nutjobs in the Government who could abuse that power in the future

    /S

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago

    For the yearly cost of a single streaming service I could buy more DVDs than I could ever watch.

    Did you know you can borrow DVDs from the library … for free.

    I would never waste another cent on streaming, the value proposition got flushed down the toilet when every single studio got into the game.

      • metaStatic@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        they will eventually stop getting my money then.

        I have a lot of straight to DVD B movies but I also have a lot of 4k steel books. Collectors are worth significantly more to the studios than they seem to realise. people who want the quality of physical media aren’t going to settle for streaming over the internet.

      • metaStatic@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Thrift stores for less than a dollar each usually in 10 for $5 type deals. multi disc sets are your friend and sometimes they don’t differentiate between DVD and blue ray either, I’ve got quite a few blu rays this way.

        DVDs are where VHS was about a decade ago, get what you can while it’s cheap. I even got a pile for free when a pawn shop was dumping stock to get out of the market.

        Also DVDs are still being pressed because there’s no licensing fee on the format so it’s still profitable to make new ones.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Fair enough, but you’re talking about replacing streaming services with DVDs, and unless you’re relegating yourself to SD content made over a decade ago and prior, you’re going to have a rough time.

          There are much better ways, and that involves the high seas.

          • metaStatic@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I have a lot of DVDs that are not currently to be found on the high seas, there are certain things I would upgrade to blu ray at the right price but for the most part you have different masters or cuts or colour grading and there are certainly things recorded in SD that are never getting a blu ray release, like concerts or other live events, because there is no high def master. I even buy concerts on VHS when I find them.

            I’m a firm believer in physical media even if that media is a spinning disk in my NAS.

            My physical media collection isn’t replacing streaming, jellyfin is.

        • Fredy1422@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Very True at my thrift store i work at all media; books, cd, dvd, blue-ray are all 50¢, unless priced (Very Rare)

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What??? People who are fed up with the megacorpos shittin on everyone, aren’t willing to pay for the services of those megacorpos when the free/torrent sources are removed? I am shocked!

    • tuhriel@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      But, but the corporations are telling us that they loose so much money from all those people who are pirating and therefore not ‘buying’ their stuff.

      I mean the numbers they showed where huge! Hmm, maybe they forgot to carry the one or swapped some +/- diring their calculations.

      • raman_klogius@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        These corpos have PhDs in creative accounting. A billion dollar revenue at the box office would still count as a loss on the ledger so as to fuck over everyone naive enough to opt to get paid out from “net profit”

  • finley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    11 hours ago

    And now we know exactly why this was done in the first place. Also, thanks for more evidence that people who pirate media probably wouldn’t pay for it anyway.

  • Night Monkey
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Lobby and demand Italian authorities crack down on the piracy because “were losing money!” Only to figure out there still losing money. I could have saved them a lot of time and money by advising them of this.