Summary

Over 18,000 unionized Costco employees, represented by the Teamsters, voted overwhelmingly to authorize a nationwide strike if a new contract is not reached by January 31.

Workers demand “fair wages and benefits,” citing Costco’s $254 billion in annual revenue and a 135% profit increase since 2018.

Practice pickets have already begun nationwide.

Union leaders warn that failure to reach a “historic, industry-leading agreement” could result in a strike, with workers emphasizing their role as the “backbone” of the company’s success.

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Unions nearly always vote to authorize during contract negotiations, to do otherwise removes all their bargaining power.

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Thing is, Costco takes such good care of most of their frontline employees that the employees legitimately don’t see the need for a union, because the company is possibly the only one in the modern world that figured out it’s cheaper if you keep employees happy by paying them more.

          Their pay scales and benefits are amazing for grocery store work, up to 30 an hour, and there is a direct promotion path from part time checkout clerk up to management with 100k+ salaries.

          • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            47 minutes ago

            A So, their annual profits are almost the same amount as the total of their annual membership fees. That means that, essentially, Costco sells everything at cost + operating expenses. I respect the hell out of thst.

            That being said, if the teamsters strike, I won’t cross the pocket line.

          • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            All employees of corporations need unions, because all corporations inherently have a motive to rob as much value from their employees as possible. And that’s the bandaid solution, not the true solution of ending capitalism.

            Also, a large part of why they have it so good as is, is because they have a union. It’s like saying “we don’t need vaccines, we’re all healthy!” while forgetting that the vaccines themselves is what made health so good.

    • athairmor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      “Good” can be relative but isn’t necessarily fair. They might treat their employees better than Walmart but making record profits and not sharing with the employees is not fair or good. The union exists to make them be fair.

      Consider that a company has no problem asking the union for concessions during low times. It’s only fair for the union to demand a share of the high times.

      • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They want a raise. I expect they also want more headcount. Go to a Costco warehouse in a major city and it’s absolutely wild how overrun they are. People are buying from Costco because buying in bulk is the only way to make it with current food prices.

    • ShawiniganHandshake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If the members don’t deliver a strike mandate to Union leadership, they have no leverage during contract negotiations. Voting against a strike is directly voting against your own interests no matter how good the employer is.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This righ here, Costco is better than the competition, they still leave a lot to be desired, especially for corp employees

    • KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That may be why the union leaders aren’t talking about matching the market or something similar, but instead a “historic, industry-leading agreement”.

    • decended_being@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They were. It’s been over 10 years since I worked there, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they still are comparatively good, but that’s because they have a union.

  • otp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Got this in my newsfeed and was worried before I found out that this is in the US, lol

    Gotta tell Google to stop feeding me American news that sounds like it could be Canadian news