Summary

Trump plans to lift the Biden administration’s freeze on supplying 2,000-pound bombs to Israel and reverse sanctions against Israeli settlers.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It absolutely is, you kept bringing up the subjective vs. objective argument.

    The objective truth is the legal rulings from the ICC court cited above.

    Your subjective notion of what’s “philosophically true” cannot be objectively proven one way or the other. That’s the very nature of philosophy.

    I gave you the citations from Biden stating his reasoning, I gave you the ruling from the ICC. These are all the legal standings surrounding Biden’s support of Israel.

    If you want the objective truth, you have it, quoted and sourced. If you choose to reject it, well, I can’t help you with that.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Holy fuck man, go talk to one of your other mods, because you’re not really not addressing this at all.

      This was never a legal matter. YOU injected that to justify moderating a moral viewpoint. The original comments are in the modlog. They weren’t making a statement about law. I wasn’t making a statement about law. YOU are the one defining the only legitimate “responsibility” a human can hold being if they are charged with a crime.

      Do you think China is not responsible for the genocide of the Uyghurs because the ICC isn’t charging them? Was Netanyahu not responsible for the genocide before the ICC case? Are only Netanyahu and Gallant responsible because they were the only ones charged? “What the court says is the only allowed truth” is such a broken viewpoint for a moderator to hold on a message board.

      Your subjective notion of what’s “philosophically true” cannot be objectively proven one way or the other. That’s the very nature of philosophy.

      YES. THAT’S THE WHOLE POINT. You moderated a subjective opinion as misinformation and then justified it with your own subjective opinion. Then insisted you were making an objective decision by pretending this was a conversation about the ICC. What the ICC thinks is irrelevant to the whole conversation. You can cite them as much as you want, but it was never the question being discussed. And like really trivially obviously so.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Again, not a moral viewpoint.

        Objectively, by any and all legal definition, Israel is responsible for the genocide in Gaza NOT Biden.

        Quoted, and cited. You can go on and on about how you “feel” diferently, but you can’t say that and ignore a legal ruling as being subjective.

        Unless, and I’m open to the very real possibility at this point, that you don’t ACTUALLY know the definitions of “objective” and “subjective”.

        https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/objective

        1: expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations

        The ICC found Israel and Netanyahu responsible for the genocide in Gaza. Factually true. They did not charge Biden. Factually true. Cited above. This is the objective reality of the situation and comments accusing Biden of genocide will continue to be removed as misinformation.

        https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subjective

        3a : characteristic of or belonging to reality as perceived rather than as independent of mind

        4a(1) : peculiar to a particular individual

        (2) : modified or affected by personal views, experience, or background

        5 : lacking in reality or substance

        “I don’t care what the ICC says! I feel different!”

        That would be you. We’re done here, it’s like talking to a poorly informed wall.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          TALK TO YOUR FELLOW MODERATORS. This is both a massive failure as a moderator and breaking your own civility rules. I’ve been a mod, it’s a hard job, but right now you’re totally failing at the role and need to step back and reevaluate what you’ve been doing.