• booly
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I would think that using fusion or fission for synthesizing elements is going to still be less efficient (among all resources, not just energy) than using the newfound abundant/cheap energy to extract those preexisting elements from mixtures that exist on Earth.

    Take neodymium, your example. That’s pretty abundant in the Earth’s crust. It’s just that it’s energy intensive to extract it from the mineral formations that naturally occur. At that point it’s still probably much cheaper, energy wise, to separate a bunch of minerals into their constituent elements, rather than try to synthesize atoms through fusion and fission.

    • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      I kinda agree with you tho. It is way more realistically to have asteroid mining facilities before what I said in the previous comment

      (And of course, earthly mining already exists and will get more efficient in the future anyways)