Context: https://lemmy.world/comment/14613536 Screenshotted context just in case:

A user claims that the killing in Palestine stopped under Biden now. I point out that biden had full-throatedly supported the genocide for over a year. A mod deletes my post and says that biden didn’t “state” (keyword here) full-throated support for genocide.

I counter by saying I consider sending billions in support of genocide counts as full-throated support for genocide. I also point out that I didn’t say Biden stated his support for genocide and that he didn’t need to outright state it because actions speak louder than words.

I receive a temp ban for that counter and the mod adds a response where they claim the weapons were “provided for defense from Iran, full stop.” which sounds to me like actual misinformation because how the hell does bombing hospitals in Gaza defend Israel from Iran? I’m not bothered by their stupid opinion, but I am bothered that they are enforcing it through moderation.

I ran into a similar moderation problem on the Political Memes community also on .world, but I didn’t bother making a post here for that because that’s just a dumb meme community and I was better off just blocking it, but now this is concerning a world news community and it’s awful to see something like this happening in a community that’s supposed to keep people aware of the news.

But hey, maybe I’m wrong and it actually is misinformation to say it’s full-throated support of genocide to send billions in weapons to a country using those weapons to commit genocide. Please let me know what you think!

  • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zone
    104·
    12 hours ago

    Don’t worry about a ban from World News

    Theres plenty of other world news communities to go to on other servers, if a servers moderation is poor vote with your feet, comments, and posts.

    Like, my opinion, man…

    Its probably too far to say “full throated support for genocide”, that administration made it very clear they didn’t like what Israel has done to Palestinians. Buut, its also hard to argue that administration didn’t passively support genocide or genocidal behaviour.

    Its clearly true to say they supported the collective punishment of a whole people. Thats unambiguous, that administration put the US on the wrong side of history, and international law, something the US was instrumental in supporting, if never adopting.

    Friends tell friends when they’re in the wrong, Israel doesn’t have a friend in the US, they’re the US’ unsinkable aircraft carrier.

    • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      6·
      4 hours ago

      that administration made it very clear they didn’t like what Israel has done to Palestinians.

      Which is why despite saying one thing they did the opposite and continued to send blank checks. Actions speak louder than words. Full throated indeed.

    • redrum@lemmy.ml
      153·
      11 hours ago

      PTB.

      Its probably too far to say “full throated support for genocide”,

      The USA is not only supporting the genocide with money and arms; they (and the UK) have also been bombing the only state (Yemen) that has tried to fulfill the international principle of Responsabilty to Protect (R2P) and has deployed their naval army to prevent others states to do it and/or to help with the genocide.

      For me, that’s enough to speak of an Israel-USA-UK genocide.

      And sorry to go off-topic. 🤷🏽

      Edit: added wiki link snd typos

      • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zone
        61·
        10 hours ago

        We disagree on the finer points, but i’m not gona argue these points.

        Fact is if these administrations don’t wish to be accused of war crimes, crimes against humanity, or contraventions of UN Charters then there are other paths throughout this period they could have chosen.