Keep promoting one corporation having control over all application interactions. Such a glorious future we can all look forward to under the watchful gaze of the CCP / corporate America.
Incredible how somebody could have such low intellect to utterly lack the capacity to separate the architecture from a specific app. I guess some people just lack the cognitive capacity needed to generalize concepts.
Lmao, rich coming from you after I already explained why the architecture is inherently, and fundamentally about controlling all interactions, not about seamless UX which can be achieved with other architectures.
Lmao, rich coming from you after I repeatedly explained to you that it’s absolutely not the case. In fact, this architecture can be implemented within a UI toolkit provided by the OS. The apps have to use the toolkit API to make a GUI, and the toolkit can expose this API as JSON for anyone to interact with. Your utter lack of understanding of the subject you’re attempting to debate is showing. Maybe once you get a bit of programming experience under your belt, then you’ll be able to talk about these things in a meaningful fashion.
Indeed, you’re utterly unable to engage with what’s being said and bleat about see see pee being the dimwit that you are. You can’t even comprehend the fact that if apps were designed as API first then it could be done using open source model because you lack cognitive capacity to carry this discussion.
Keep promoting one corporation having control over all application interactions. Such a glorious future we can all look forward to under the watchful gaze of the CCP / corporate America.
Literally has nothing to do with anything I said. Gotta put more effort into your trolling kiddo. 🤣
Whoosh.
You’re trying too hard man, after about 2 rounds it became obvious that China way =good, 'Murica way=bad and that’s the bottom line.
thank you for providing peak liberal analysis
Quite welcome, I’m sure the great worker’s uprising will come one day and we shall all be forced to use the glorious app known as WeChat.
Incredible how somebody could have such low intellect to utterly lack the capacity to separate the architecture from a specific app. I guess some people just lack the cognitive capacity needed to generalize concepts.
Lmao, rich coming from you after I already explained why the architecture is inherently, and fundamentally about controlling all interactions, not about seamless UX which can be achieved with other architectures.
Lmao, rich coming from you after I repeatedly explained to you that it’s absolutely not the case. In fact, this architecture can be implemented within a UI toolkit provided by the OS. The apps have to use the toolkit API to make a GUI, and the toolkit can expose this API as JSON for anyone to interact with. Your utter lack of understanding of the subject you’re attempting to debate is showing. Maybe once you get a bit of programming experience under your belt, then you’ll be able to talk about these things in a meaningful fashion.
Indeed, you’re utterly unable to engage with what’s being said and bleat about see see pee being the dimwit that you are. You can’t even comprehend the fact that if apps were designed as API first then it could be done using open source model because you lack cognitive capacity to carry this discussion.