This is an automatic repost from SubReddit r/Vancouver by a bot created by @[email protected]
Try my Telegram channel https://t.me/vancitynews for getting local news
This is an automatic repost from SubReddit r/Vancouver by a bot created by @[email protected]
Try my Telegram channel https://t.me/vancitynews for getting local news
The headline is questionable, please read the article fully.
Yeah it’s incredibly misleading.
The woman was required to provide evidence for a given year and then gives bills and paperwork covering unrelated years.
This person sounds dumb or confused.