koulib to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agoWhich new Protocol or Standard are you most excited about?message-squaremessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up188arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up185arrow-down1message-squareWhich new Protocol or Standard are you most excited about?koulib to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square53fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDomi@lemmy.secnd.melinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoECH is intended for privacy, not for circumventing censorship. If the next TLS version enforces ECH, plaintext SNI will die out at some point on its own.
minus-squarekhorovodoved@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoIntensions do not metter in this case. It can be used for that and that’s enough. If you block any connections that use ECH (by blocking cloudflare-ech for example) users will have no choice but to fallback to unencrypted CH.
ECH is intended for privacy, not for circumventing censorship.
If the next TLS version enforces ECH, plaintext SNI will die out at some point on its own.
Intensions do not metter in this case. It can be used for that and that’s enough. If you block any connections that use ECH (by blocking cloudflare-ech for example) users will have no choice but to fallback to unencrypted CH.