So now we’re being forced to have poorer performance and locked into buying more expensive hardware.

I’ll have to pass on this type of crap and vote with my wallet when ray tracing still isn’t there for the majority of pc gamers.

  • kungfuratte@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Doom 2016 needed half of that for every single metric!

    On the other hand that was almost a decade ago.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      to be fair graphics havent advanced as much in the last decade compared with the previous one to justify higher and higher requirements.

      • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Titanfall 2 is 9 years old and looks pretty damned good compared to recent releases. The biggest jump I have seen in graphics was HL:Alyx and a lot of that was VR letting you press your eyeballs up against the windows to see the sweaty hand prints.

        There is plenty of room for publishers improve without leaning on new hardware features.

    • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes, but the tech has not advanced that much since then. Also the game probably doesn’t look twice as good.

      Tbh. the game needing 8 cores is the most outrageous of the list, but the ray tracing is a close second, since that could easily be toggleable.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Depending on how a game is made, no, ray casting may not be “easily toggleable”

        You wouldn’t complain about games requiring DirectX 12, or requiring DirectX 11, 10, whatever, in the past, so why complain about ray tracing? Modern games require modern GPU features, that is nothing new.

        • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I totally complained about games needing dx12! I had to buy my current video card to meet that demand!

          I have been planning on upgrading, but my budget is about $400. A RX 7600 looks like it might fit that budget.

        • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Maybe I wouldn’t, but I would definitely complain if this was a very new feature available in higher end GPUs.

          DX12 is also software, it’s easily update able and modern hardware supports it.

          But in the end I don’t give a fuck, since I just won’t play doom then.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s been a standard for graphics cards for around a decade now, it’s not just high end GPUs

            And, yeah, you don’t need to play newest titles. But devs do want to move with the times and utilize modern features. This is nothing new, and was worse in the past, in fact. Things have slowed down from how they used to be 20 years ago.

        • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          In a doom game ray tracing should not be used for registering hits, since most if not all of the projectiles are visible and fly slower than light.